chore: manual review and comment cleanup pass over the driver batch #115
Labels
No labels
Category
App
Category
Documentation
Category
Firmware
Category
Hardware
Category
Qms
PR_Size
L
PR_Size
M
PR_Size
S
PR_Size
XL
PR_Size
XS
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Priority
Very Low Priority
Size
Epic
Size
Feature
Size
Task
Status
Blocked
Status
Draft
Status
Needs-review
Team
Board
Team
Dev
Team
Management
Type
Bug
Type
Capa
Type
Improvement
Type
New-feature
Type
Regulatory
Type
Usability
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
opendutchsolutions.public/hal_awr6843#115
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Description
Manual review pass over the DSS-side driver batch just landed (Mailbox #99/#100, EDMA #101/#102, VIM #103/#104, DSS ADCBUF #105/#106, DSS INTC #107/#108, DSS Cache #109/#110, DSS HWA #111/#112, DSS RTI #113/#114), plus a second look at the MSS-side batch that preceded it (#75-#98). Several of these drivers accumulated long, dense top-of-file and inline comments during implementation (register-provenance notes, scope-limitation rationale, hardware-quirk writeups) — useful at review time, but worth a human pass to decide what earns a permanent place in the source versus what was scaffolding for getting the PR reviewed and can be trimmed once the code itself is read and understood.
To be performed manually, not by an agent — this is a judgment-call pass over code the author needs to read closely regardless of what any tooling reports.
Use Case / Rationale
As the maintainer, I need to read through the newly landed driver source with fresh eyes, independent of the incremental per-PR review that already happened, to catch anything a narrower per-driver review might have missed and to decide which comments genuinely carry non-obvious rationale (hardware quirks, register-naming mismatches, documented scope cuts) versus which restate what the code already says.
Acceptance Criteria
hal/dss/**) manually read end to endFunctional Impact
None expected — comment-only changes unless the manual review surfaces an actual defect, which would be split into its own issue rather than folded in here.
Regulatory Impact
None
QMS Impact
Possible — if the review changes what's documented inline about hardware quirks or scope limits, downstream traceability docs referencing those drivers may need a follow-up look.
Risk Impact
None — read-only review with no landed change until the author explicitly decides what to edit.
Related Issues / PRs
Relates to #4, relates to #99, relates to #101, relates to #103, relates to #105, relates to #107, relates to #109, relates to #111, relates to #113
chore: manual review and comment cleanup pass over the DSS-side driver batchto chore: manual review and comment cleanup pass over the driver batch